December 09, 2009
Sadly, I've also become fairly certain that aspartame is a no-no for me, which isn't a huge shock, but it's disappointing. It's not uncommon for an insulin response to accompany a sugarless sweetener, even if no actual carbohydrates are eaten. Supposedly, saccharine doesn't do this to most people, but it's still saccharine. No thanks. I'm not sure I want to bother seriously experimenting with sucralose/Splenda. I might try stevia extract, but it seems easier to just avoid sweet things altogether, since they mess with my palate and cause me to crave starches.
In any event, this puts me down 18 lb in 7 weeks. If I can lose another 2 lb by next weigh-in, I'll be slightly ahead of my goal of 10 lb per month, since 2 months proper will be Dec 21.
Posted by: leoncaruthers at
11:20 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 235 words, total size 1 kb.
December 02, 2009
It's also possible that I've just done this too many times now (lost weight and then regained it), and my metabolism has become particularly resistant to changes in weight (up or down; I've never managed to go above 220 either, no matter how bad my diet has been, and I usually stop at 205 on the way down and get frustrated). The only cure for that is patience and consistency.
There are some other tricks I might employ, but I'm waiting to be sure those are absolutely necessary before using them to break the plateau.
Posted by: leoncaruthers at
10:34 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 164 words, total size 1 kb.
November 25, 2009
Posted by: leoncaruthers at
08:34 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 46 words, total size 1 kb.
November 18, 2009
My waist measured in at... 40". That's what I get for estimating rather than measuring back on day 1. I couldn't find the tape that day, and I'm pretty sure this was my version of "rock bottom", so I haphazardly guessed that my waist was 2" larger around than my pants said it was. Apparently a 38" pair of Wranglers is very, very generous, because my waist is visibly smaller than it was, and my pants are quite loose, to the point of being unwearable without a belt. I'll just have to go forward with waist measurements from this point, since guessing at my original size would be just that: a guess.
Posted by: leoncaruthers at
09:22 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 132 words, total size 1 kb.
November 11, 2009
It's tough to know something is basically life-or-death and treat it like life-or-death when it lacks all the traditional cues of life-or-death (like, say, an angered mother bear or an advancing line of mongol horsemen with bows drawn).
Posted by: leoncaruthers at
09:35 AM
| Comments (1)
| Add Comment
Post contains 55 words, total size 1 kb.
November 04, 2009
In related news, here's a fun post at the Heart Scan Blog.
Also, I find it funny and sad that sucralose and aspartame -- both laboratory products found nowhere in nature -- have both found approval as sweeteners by the US FDA, but miraculin was denied. I suppose you could argue that miraculin might cause the imbiber to consume lots of acidic foods and cause injury of some sort, but it hardly feels like something the government ought to be protecting us from.
Posted by: leoncaruthers at
09:18 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 150 words, total size 1 kb.
October 28, 2009
However, low-carbohydrate dieting has the added advantage of maintaining a very steady (and low) insulin level in the bloodstream. The process of creating new adipose tissue (i.e. laying down new body fat) is regulated largely by insulin levels. Low insulin => not much new fatty tissue being created. That means if you're ever in a caloric deficit, you'll reach into your existing fat stores* without making new ones, thus facilitating fat loss. Further, with so little sugar (glucose) in your bloodstream much of the time, times of exertion will leave your body using mostly fat for fuel, since blood sugar is the only ready supply of carbohydrate fuel after the glycogen in your muscles is spent. To be perfectly accurate, real metabolism burns all three fuel sources simultaneously, but the proportion of fat metabolism increases significantly when there's not much sugar laying around.
What all this gibberish really means is that the first two weeks will be big losers, but the weeks and months after that will also be losers, if somewhat smaller losers.
*Interesting note, this can sometimes make you sick. There are a number of toxins that your body has a tough time getting rid of, and many of them are fat soluble, so some of them inevitably creep into your fatty tissue. When you start to use older fat, some of the toxic compounds creep back out, and can then cause illness. Weird, huh?
Posted by: leoncaruthers at
07:39 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 387 words, total size 2 kb.
October 21, 2009
WebMD says I can safely lose 3lb a week. So, conservatively (heh), I'm planning to lose 10 pounds a month for the next 8 months. Putting me at a final weight of 140lb at the end of June, 2010. I've weighed as little as 127 as an adult, and 140 would give me a BMI of 23.3, which should make it a healthy weight.
Anyhow, I'm going to be following my progress with Aspiring Mad Scientist, in addition to my usual completely sporadic posts on the usual subjects. I'll keep it concise, mostly updating my weight and waistline numbers, since those are the easiest to meter, but occasionally delving into nutrition. I'm doing it to keep a record, and to hold myself accountable.
Posted by: leoncaruthers at
04:56 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 217 words, total size 1 kb.
55 queries taking 0.0666 seconds, 126 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.